Broken Blood Vessels In Testicles

Merry Christmas.




A Merry Christmas and best wishes for the new year. The work of this blog are suspended with the hope to resume them in a new light, that little has enjoyed in recent times. I take this opportunity to reveal (to those who do not already know) the fabled gift that our president has done to the room editor of Felt for Christmas: a nice bottle of Valium, with best wishes to recover from his "obsessions and hallucinations." Here, we do hope that everyone is not obsessing in front of this crazy little theater that is replacing important issues which I would like you to speak, so as to not have to daily always devote the usual corny things (even if sometimes sadly renovated some shameful incident). I regret not having been able to take care of the climate conference in Copenhagen, but I have not seen in any news and no news to be explored. I'm sorry I did not have to deal with financial problems, it was just a brick and packed light not discussed. I regret not being able to talk more about immigration, despite the fine words of the opening of Fini, because it was immediately accused of all that we know and then there was talk of nothing else. In short, we hope for something more in 2010, to tell you that this is not my fault the deal always just the same things. This blog is a "mirror cleaning," to show that when it seems that there is more to say, in reality there is an abyss, and the questions never go unspoken. I certainly can not impose any major issues to which I devote attention.

Ah, I do my best wishes to family and friends who support me and sometimes helps in the continuation of this space. Valium in a head and sweet dreams XD 2009.

How Long Does It Take For Dyslexia Results

Odi et amo ..

Tie, beccatevi real-time speech aired shortly ago by Travaglio. This time the journalist had little originality. In fact, many bloggers have already started yesterday in the evening and this morning with similar operations of "response" to the words of Prime Minister the "people who love to hate against minority populations." So in a few hours this theory has not only been removed but obviously taken to jeers from the people of the network, which has performed in post long on insults, swear words and turns of obscene words by politicians and journalists "right ..". In fact, today the left-right comparison was reduced to this: I hate you love, I love you hate .. I work you do not, I box you do not. These categories have been deliberately put in place are essentially similar to those of the ultra-nationalist sentiments, "I know myself and this is my land, out why you're different." Of course there is a difference. Consistency.



PS As you may have noticed I changed the graphics. Now there is a minimum order of color and more. You'll notice the inspiration to free colored "facebook")

Difference In Emu Bronte And Stinger Boot

Concita respect you.


Now, let's talk about two seconds. I look at people in the face, I do not care that bear the label of the right, left, fascism, communism justicialism antiberlusconismo and so on and so forth. Especially if the labels are affixed by third parties. The only "tags" are those that apply each be entered on your chest. The merit / demerit through thoughts, words, deeds and omissions. Today, the credit goes to a real journalist capable which is one of the few / s write words of wisdom in a time when newspapers are more moderate extremists, perhaps because extremes lie less in their hypocrisy. The good Concita de Gregorio, head of the Unit (not even read a newspaper) has surprised everyone for his stubbornness and his education. This is one of his editorials, widely read and commented on the web.
PS This reporter probebilmente some ideas different from mine, but today it is in the foreground on this blog. Maybe it will affect a few, I emphasize because it is rare today.

Plan subversive

"This is what is irresponsible. Lie. Shamelessly say how does the newspaper headlines that "everything was organized." Use the gesture of a person who is not well (where was the security, where he was watching?) To criminalize any form of criticism and dissent, ultimately putting the foundations for a police state where it becomes difficult, if not better, express, express their own opinion so harsh as also happens in every democratic country.
There is no need for special laws, just enforce the ones we have. You do not need the tax shelter, just tighten up controls and to pay taxes. You do not need obscure internet, just use the tools that exist to stop people who abuse. Close Internet equivalent to break the thermometer to treat fever. The problem, as usual, is not who says what is happening: the problem is what happens, and not just close off the streets and obscure sites because the facts cease to exist. It will only be much worse. Will serve to exacerbate people's minds to cause - so yes, it really - riots. Not necessary to eliminate jobs or reduce to a flicker, just submit to the reviews. If I travel constantly in the wrong Fine 2500 times and I have not harassed by the cops. I have two options: to prove that I was not driving or paying fines . The rule exists, change the laws in the race means sending the message that Italians who can - only those who can, of course - do as he pleases. The other fools. Equip themselves to become very rich and powerful or pretending that you just attach the wagon to those who it is. Irresponsible and undermines the rules because it's convenient, you go faster, boredom that this Parliament, which weights these processes that torment this release. Eliminate it. do not need to change the Constitution, just respect it. Comply with the Charter, the powers, the judiciary, the head of state, the opposition. Do not say every other day is another well that the flag is in the toilet, the opposition is jerk, subversive judges, the head of state partisan. Do not pretend that we have the years of lead, as it did evoke Yesterday Cicchitto terrorism and moral principals and meanwhile, with the other hand, put the trust on a budget that returns to the Mafia seized property. This is so irresponsible, dangerous, criminal. To evoke the terror pork with the minimum standards of living, the debate between those who have different ideas and so it must be pointed out as murderess making lump everything: confused violence with legitimate concern, Tartaglia with Rosi Bindi and woe betide anyone who dares to say a syllable. We are not the years of lead, Cicchitto. We are never ever the case P2. We are faced with a clear design. Free headline yesterday: the Public Prosecutor in Palermo do not give up. Here's the deal: trade in the cathedral face with a wet sponge. A mad wounded him, national emergency, may be reset processes. What? Not a factor. For the processes we go, is struggling. In Parliament you go, you shall submit to the vote. Also in the square we go. To criticize, to make speeches. In the case of meetings, possibly with a good security services. This, in a normal country, today we speak. How to ensure the safety and civility in the comparison, not eliminate it. "

Concita De Gregorio, The Unit.

Can You Put A Snowblower On A F250

As a self-destruct system.

This reflection comes from these past two years and the imaginary Italian (as well as the experience of the viewer-citizen) over the last 5-6 years. We intend to primarily as "regime" is a generic term referring to an ethical status of a nation that is democratic or authoritarian (so the system can be a parliamentary democracy, a popular dictatorship, a monarchy, etc.). I was interrogated at length about what are the "terms in the game" for life, the life and health of a system. I concluded (without any study of political science) with the reflection of similar assessments in some of the basic economic theory, applied ethics.
We are therefore in my opinion much in gambling in a state that makes the difference. But identifying the life of a regime as a "life cycle", we could draw a bit like a parabola. Being on a sheet, only and exclusively in two dimensions, we must abstract from these essential items only. I have identified three , which are the fundamental elements involved in any scheme: The command, the recipient and the message. Simplifying these very general notions we might call them the majority leader, the citizen-subject-propaganda and communication.

The "Chief" may be a dictator in a dictatorship, a king in a monarchy, a government in a democracy, whether parliamentary or authoritarian. The balance (which represents the degree of tilt of our parabola) is in the consistency between the policy of the head (and his real identity), the communication of that policy and the satisfaction of the people. If this balance remains over time, a very flat parabola ensure a shared status quo for a long time. But it is still a parabola, and the downturn is inevitable. Politics is made of compromises and propaganda (identifying propaganda in our system as the communication gap between identity politics and committed message to citizens, thus inconsistent with the identity withheld from the subject line). Over time is inevitable as the propaganda is initially used as a bonding where the policy does not work, up to the critical point of stalemate, the time that people recognize the lies and bias of information (and therefore the inconsistency of the third factor above above). So the people began to complain, to clear your mind of any political bias and want more transparency and equality. Here is the ultimate choice of the "regime": the three factors are no longer agree . Or change the head or change the message, or change the people. The people can not change if not in the long run (and this can be thought and thought the television in the last 15 years, for example) but only up to a certain limit. The other two factors, once understood the basic inconsistency of the system must change together.

Now, the West has become democratic because it has recognized the ability of democracies to change background factors "head and shout" when it is deemed necessary to ensure a parable of their regime as long as possible. In some states (think of the history of twentieth-century), instead they forced our hand to change over time through the factor people (mainly but not only) control media (remember the radio regime of Mussolini). Who chose the first route stretched the life cycle of the status quo, who chose him second permanently shortened. In some cases you could not make it too short with a clever game to transform and blackmail, but the road is still marked.

The parable then rises and reaches the point of stalemate. Citizens protest and power, however, made (Dictatorship, democracy, monarchy, etc.) must find a solution NOT censorship, but dedicated to listen and to compromise (note: true compromise, not through the front of the same communication that the people have already identified as not credible). If it fails, is the descent. If the squares democratic (many, regardless of majority or minority politics formed) are left "only" the fall begins, and is even more sudden as the severe discomfort. From now on, shoot urbi et orbi propaganda is a partial remedy and inconsiderate, as more violent and will be incurable the fall. If citizens are left alone their problems, thanks "maybe" an economic downturn, or near a conflict, no matter that the element "message" may be reassuring or propionate as the incredible true consent to the king / chief / government must first understand that if the descent began, everything becomes transient. Do not put a piece, without means to attract new horizons vent non-democratic (in democracies) and actual violence where the regime is authoritarian. Both the long years of Mussolini as fast as the moments of tumult and violence that led to his death. If indeed the system of a state repudiates war and violence, not the people but the institutions themselves and in particular the element "head" are responsible order and dialogue. The discomfort is never the son of a whim. The institutional right messages, the real ones, healthy ones, can lead to a distenzione. Propaganda only exacerbating the curve of the parabola.


Now, it is for the reader to adapt this model to the situation of any government / state and of course Italy in 2009, at a time beyond which frankly views intimidates all those democratic and intelligent. If I say it all, in a moment of tension is considering censoring the internet and to indicate the enemy as responsible for the violence. Stop the spiral, and that those responsible think to flatten the parable, accepting once and for all that you are now in decline, an increase of speed. The popular consensus and stability of a country are not so rigidly associated, especially when the propaganda, as mentioned, is by definition not in line with the identity of the head. Mussolini has to teach us, except that increased democratic, and almost to the last democratically administered with the consent (implied or absence) of the people. And perhaps he was more consistent messages and actions. But we know the consequences. Doing some more comparisons that can not be done in 2009, the system examined above, but fully questionable, for those who share remains the same. We talk to stop the spiral. Well, but after a civil and democratic renewal in the parable, restoring coherence to the system head-citizen message.

If (for example, and said that I am not hate anyone) a party agrees to talk to the head and continues to do so without compromise that created the problem (remember the beginning of the last term) is not in "enemies" that find the answer to the question "but why do some people hate me."

Andrea Tuscano

What Kind Of Cheese Does East Side Marios Use ?

Spread the word: The most loved by Italians.

After all disconcerting since this morning told the principals 'moral' of the attack yesterday, I'm really confused. I wonder how they do it to shoot accusing many lies to the right and left political opponents and journalists on a fact like this, although everyone has pointed out that violence is bad and to blame (yes, even Peter, but not only much less stressed, but the TV has then thought to abstract from his speech, only the secondary and most inappropriate at a time like this.). Today "The newspaper has blamed everyone: Casini, Di Pietro, Bindi, even Fini. We laugh a little bit of truth in these hours that border on indecency.